Quality Assurance Representative from USACETheir technicians were very knowledgeable in boiler removal and installation.
Quality Assurance Representative from USACEOne of the best mechanical contractor’s I have worked with to date; great communications, product submittals, and identifying potential problem at the start of project.
Area Engineer from Department of the ArmyThis contractor is proactive and handled most coordination items without unnecessarily involving the Government.
Area Engineer from Department of the ArmyThis contractor has an exceptional safety record. This is due to their emphasis on safety from the corporate head to the onsite personnel. The corporate safety officer was onsite during construction.
Area Engineer from Department of the ArmyThe team assembled by the prime contractor from the
corporate head through the construction manager to the onsite superintendent and QC managers were devoted to providing a quality product on time and under budget.
Contracting officer from P.W. Engineering DivisionThe contractor furnished timely payroll records and complied with all labor
laws in an outstanding manner.
Contracting officer from P.W. Engineering DivisionMaterials provided were very good. Submittals were timely and complete.
Regional representative from Design and ConstructionAny discrepancies in the contract documents were brought up with more than enough time to address them through RFIs without delaying the schedule.
Engineer in charge from Design and ConstructionThe contractor finished the project ahead of schedule and far exceeded the required PC date by more than 60 days ahead.
Reginal supervisor from Design and ConstructionThis is one of the few contractors I would give a better-than-excellent rating to if it was possible.
Facility representative from Design and ConstructionThe contractor finished the project ahead of schedule and far exceeded the required PC date by more than 60 days ahead.
Faculty representative from Design and ConstructionAll scheduling deadlines were met, the schedule was updated accurately on a monthly basis and exceed the baseline set by the contractor.
Regional supervisor from Design and ConstructionThey never had to be reminded of anything and anytime an issue arose the contractor called the EIC to let him know what the issue was and how they were fixing it to prevent any type of delay.
Engineer in charge from Design and ConstructionAll scheduling deadlines were met, the schedule was updated accurately on a monthly basis and exceed the baseline set by the contractor.
Facility representative from Design and ConstructionAll deliveries were coordinated with the work going on onsite as not to clutter the work area and only deliver stuff to the job site when it was being installed.
Engineer in charge from Design and ConstructionThe initial BDC 329 was submitted within 3 days of the IJM and the updated version was submitted the same day the contractor found out the supplier was not qualified to supply the commercial grade ATS that was required for the job.
Regional representative from Design and ConstructionThe contractor went above and beyond to complete submittals in the first three days of the project being awarded.